A Neural Network Time Series Model to Forecast Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Concentrations in Central Siberia
PDF (Russian)

Keywords

forecasting
carbon dioxide
climate change
random forest
gradient boosting
LSTM

How to Cite

1.
Volodko O.S., Buryak N.A. A Neural Network Time Series Model to Forecast Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Concentrations in Central Siberia // Russian Journal of Cybernetics. 2026. Vol. 7, № 2. P. 102-108.

Abstract

the rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations driven by natural and anthropogenic factors is one of the main causes of climate change, making accurate long-term forecasting of atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations an important scientific challenge. In this study, we compared the performance of several machine learning methods for forecasting atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations using time series data collected at the ZOTTO Station in Central Siberia in 2009–2022. We evaluated ensemble methods, including random forest and gradient boosting, together with a recurrent neural network based on the Long Short-Term Memory architecture. The predictor variables included fire intensity, a lag variable representing the number of days since the beginning of the observation period, and meteorological parameters, including air temperature, daily maximum and minimum temperatures, dew point temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, atmospheric pressure, and precipitation. The results showed that the Long Short-Term Memory model achieved higher forecasting accuracy on the validation dataset than the ensemble methods, with a 2.87 mean absolute error, .91 RMS error, and 0.83 coefficient of determination. We found that air temperature, relative humidity, dew point temperature, and wind speed were the most important predictors of atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations.

PDF (Russian)

References

Timokhina A. V., Prokushkin A. S., Panov A. V., Kolosov R. A., Sidenko N. V., Lavric J., Heimann M. Interannual Variability of Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations over Central Siberia from ZOTTO Data for 2009–2015. Russian Meteorology and Hydrology. 2018;43(5):288-294. DOI: 10.3103/S1068373918050023.

Liu W., Niu Z., Feng X., Zhou W., Liang D., Wang G., Liu L. Determining the Key Meteorological Factors Affecting Atmospheric CO2 and CH4 Using Machine Learning Algorithms at a Suburban Site in China. Urban Climate. 2025;59:102312. DOI: 10.1016/j.uclim.2025.102312.

Rezaei Z., Samghabadi S. S., Amini M. A., Shi D., Banad Y. M. Predicting Climate Change: A Comparative Analysis of Time Series Models for CO2 Concentrations and Temperature Anomalies. Environmental Modelling & Software. 2025;192:106533. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106533.

Dieu Anh T., Gerbig C., Rödenbeck C., Panov A., Prokushkin A., Winderlich J., Lavrič J., Heimann M., Seifert T., Schultz U., Schmidt S., Zaehle S. Zotino Tall Tower Observatory (ZOTTO) Hourly CO2 Measurement Dataset. Edmond. Режим доступа: https://doi.org/doi:10.17617/3.YBPFG2.

NASA FIRMS: Fire Information for Resource Management System. Режим доступа: https://firms.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov/.

NASA POWER: Prediction of Worldwide Energy Resources. Режим доступа: https://power.larc.nasa.gov/.

Biau G., Scornet E. A Random Forest Guided Tour. Test. 2016;25(2):197–227. DOI: 10.1007/s11749-016-0481-7.

Xie Y., Tummala S. P. Machine Learning for Sensor Analytics: A Comprehensive Review and Benchmark of Boosting Algorithms in Healthcare, Environmental, and Energy Applications. Sensors. 2025;25(23):7294. DOI: 10.3390/s25237294.

Hochreiter S., Schmidhuber J. Long Short-Term Memory. Neural Computation. 1997;9(8):17351780.

Старовойтов В. В., Голуб Ю. И. Нормализация данных в машинном обучении. Информатика. 2021;18(3):83–96. DOI: 10.37661/1816-0301-2021-18-3-83-96.

Brassington G. Mean Absolute Error and Root Mean Square Error: Which Is the Better Metric for Assessing Model Performance? EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. 2017;19:3574.

Pearson K. On Lines and Planes of Closest Fit to Systems of Points in Space. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 1901;2(11):559–572. DOI: 10.1080/14786440109462720.

Hauke J., Kossowski T. Comparison of Values of Pearson’s and Spearman’s Correlation Coefficients on the Same Sets of Data. Quaestiones Geographicae. 2011;30(2):87–93. DOI: 10.2478/v10117-0110021-1.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.