A Model of Interaction and Competition Between Two Types of Autonomous Agents
PDF (Russian)

Keywords

interactions between agents
defensive agents
predatory agents
threatening agents
escaping from threatening agents

How to Cite

1.
Redko V.G. A Model of Interaction and Competition Between Two Types of Autonomous Agents // Russian Journal of Cybernetics. 2025. Vol. 6, № 1. P. 128–136.

Abstract

this work constructs and studies a model of interaction between two types of autonomous agents. The model assumes that strong, predatory agents and relatively weak defensive agents coexist in a cellular world. Defensive agents typically do not attack others but can collectively resist a predator. They occupy a specific area of the world known as the ”defensive agent domain”. Each agent has its resources, and defensive agents can replenish their resources by eating portions of food. Predator agents can attack, kill, and eat defensive agents, significantly increasing their resources when they succeed. A large group of defensive agents can pose a threat to a predator that enters their area. To coordinate their actions, defensive agents elect a leader. Upon encountering a predator, the leader commands the defensive agents to gather in a specific location and then collectively threaten the predator, driving it out of their area. This work demonstrates that a large group of relatively weak defensive agents can successfully resist strong predator agents.

PDF (Russian)

References

Artificial Life: The Proceedings of an Interdisciplinary Workshop on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems. Redwood City CA: Addison-Wesley; 1989. 655 p.

Artificial Life II: Proceedings of the Second Artificial Life Workshop. Redwood City CA: AddisonWesley; 1992. 854 p.

Yaeger L. S. Computational Genetics, Physiology, Metabolism, Neural Systems, Learning, Vision, and Behavior or PolyWorld: Life in a New Context. Proceedings of the Artificial Life III Conference. AddisonWesley; 1994;17:263–298.

Yaeger L., Sporns O., Williams S., Shuai X., Dougherty S. Evolutionary Selection of Network Structure and Function. Artificial Life XII: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on the Simulation and Synthesis of Living Systems. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England: The MIT Press; 2010:313–320. Режим доступа: https://dn790008.ca.archive.org/0/items/ArtificialLifeXII/Artificial%20Life%20XII.pdf.

Ackley D., Littman M. Interactions between Learning and Evolution. Artificial Life II: Proceedings of the Second Artificial Life Workshop. Redwood City CA: Addison-Wesley; 1992:487–509.

Holland J. H. Echoing Emergence: Objectives, Rough Definitions, and Speculations for Echo-class Models. Complexity: Metaphors, Models and Reality. Addison-Wesley; 1994:309–342.

Hraber P. T., Jones T., Forrest S. The Ecology of Echo. Artificial Life. 1997;3(3):165–190. DOI: 10.1162/artl.1997.3.3.165.

Коваль А. Г., Редько В. Г. Поведение модельных организмов, обладающих естественными потребностями и мотивациями. Математическая биология и биоинформатика. 2012;7(1):266–273. DOI: 10.17537/2012.7.266.

Burtsev M., Turchin P. Evolution of Cooperative Strategies from First Principles. Nature. 2006;440(7087):1041–1044. DOI: 10.1038/nature04470.

Lorenz K. On Aggression. London, New York: Routledge Classics; 2002. 306 p.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.